ISO 9001 Standards – Quality Policy and Objectives

A ISO 9001 Standards quality policy and its corresponding quality objectives are established to direct the organization towards two specific goals of a quality management system:

-Provision of products – goods and services – that meet customer and applicable legal requirements, and

- Enhancement of customer satisfaction

The quality policy and the objectives are also a means of controlling the quality management system’s processes. Simply, if you want to control a process, assign an objective to it (or more) and make sure it is aligned to the quality policy, then monitor and measure the process’ performance against the assigned objective. You need to provide adequate resources to the process to ensure that it is capable of achieving the objective. You continually improve the whole process by upgrading the objective, make corrective and preventive actions or introduce innovation to it. Corrective action addresses an undesirable situation’s cause in order to prevent its recurrence. Preventive action, by contrast, addresses the probable cause of a potentially undesirable situation. This is what the quality policy and objectives are supposed to do. They provide focus, direction and control.

The quality objectives need to be consistent with the quality policy and the commitment to continual improvement, and their achievement needs to be measurable. The achievement of quality objectives can have a positive impact on product quality, operational effectiveness and financial performance and thus on the satisfaction and confidence of interested parties. When an organization has established a quality policy and a set of operational objectives, this means the only thing left to do is to design or plan the necessary processes or tasks that can realize those objectives. Therefore, the processes determine if the objectives will be met in full, partially or not at all. This is where the ISO 9001 standard play a critical role in specifying the required processes and the operating criteria. This is what ISO 9001 is all about. It even specifies criteria for the policy and the objectives.

A quality policy needs to satisfy the following requirements:

• It is appropriate to the purpose of the organization,
• It includes a commitment to comply with requirements and continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system,
• It provides a framework for establishing and reviewing quality objectives,
• It is communicated and understood within the organization, and
• It is reviewed for continuing suitability

Quality objectives must be established in order to enable the organization to comply with requirements and continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system. Quality objectives must achieve four things:

• Enable the organization to meet customer requirements
• Enable the organization to enhance customer satisfaction
• Enable the organization to comply with all legal requirements applicable to the product
• Continually contribute to the effectiveness of the quality management system

Therefore, when you are in the meeting room with your management brainstorming on the appropriate objectives, have these four points in mind.

ISO 9001:2000 requires that management periodically review changes to both the policy and objectives. An organization’s objectives must be measurable and its processes designed to meet those objectives. An organization’s overall business goals, quality objectives and quality policy are all interrelated and must work together to achieve business improvement. To do this, it’s necessary to understand which processes are key to achieving business goals and align those processes with the quality objectives. It means aligning business goals, quality objectives and process measures to create real improvement. And it means using process mapping. Process mapping involves more than just flow charting. Among other things, it can manage and improve processes by illustrating process measures as well as process flows and interactions. One process-mapping method begins by involving the people who work in the process. Another entails mapping the process as is, taking action to improve it and then preparing a final map of the improved process.

Process owners are directly responsible for the attainment of the objectives. They must be given adequate resources, including competent human resources. They need to review the objectives periodically to ensure the key performance indicators are heading towards their objectives on schedule. If not, they need to initiate corrective actions and if the risks of non-achievement are visible, take preventive actions to control them and steer the KPI’s back on course.

Examples of quality objectives:

• Production rejects <>
• Machine breakdown <>
• Returned products = 0/mth
• Purchasing >95% on-time delivery
• Inventory damage = 0/mth

Conclusion: ISO 9001 requires that the quality management system achieves its objectives in order to realize the quality policy.

Read more on ISO 9001 standards at http://www.iso9001store.com

Process Approach In ISO 9001 Standards

The process approach was introduced into ISO 9001 with the year 2000 version of the standards.

Prior versions used an element approach. The document Guidance on the concept and use of the process approach for management systems describes to process approach and offers an implementation paradigm.

2.4. Verify the process and its activities against its planned objectives
3. Implementation and measurement of the process
4. Analysis of the process
5. Corrective action and improvement of the process Implementation
This document explains the process used to evaluate changes to the 2008 version. In particular, it explains the revision process and illustrates the impact vs. benefit analysis used to evaluate potential changes.
In addition to the guidance documents, ISO maintains a web site with “official interpretations” of

approach was introduced into ISO 9001 with the year 2000 version of the standards.
Prior versions used an element approach. The document Guidance on the concept and use of the process approach for managementsystems describes to process approach and offers an implementation paradigm.
1. Identification of processes of the organization
1.1. Define the purpose of the organization
1.2. Define the policies and objectives of the organization
1.3. Determine the processes in the organization
1.4. Determine the sequence of the processes
1.5. Define process ownership
1.6. Define process documentation
2. Planning of a process
2.1. Define the activities within the process
2.2. Define the monitoring and measurement requirements
2.3. Define the resources needed

ISO 9001. Currently, these interpretations only include ISO 9001:2000, but, because the changes to the 2008 version were limited, they are valuable.
Consider a common question. An organization needs a documented procedure for preventive action (8.5.3), and must keep records of the results of preventive action (8.5.3.d). One of the interpretation requests asks, “Does sub-clause 8.5.3 a) require organizations to demonstrate, with objective evidence in the form of records, that they have undertaken actions to determine the existence of ‘potential nonconformities and their causes’?” The answer is “No”.
Auditing Practices
The ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group maintains a website9 with guidance and information on auditing ISO 9001 quality management systems. It is an informal group of quality management system (QMS) experts, auditors, and practitioners drawn from the ISO Technical Committee 176 Quality Management and Quality Assurance(ISO/TC 176) and the International Accreditation Forum (IAF).
The website, primarily aimed at QMS auditors, consultants, and quality practitioners, is an online source of papers and presentations on auditing a QMS and reflect the process based approach.
The website contains almost forty guidance documents with practical advice ranging from “How to audit top management processes” to “The role and value of the audit checklist”.

ISO 9001 Standards & ISO 14001 Standards

In order to assist organizations to have a full understanding of the new ISO 9001:2008, it may be useful to have an insight on the revision process, how this revision reflects the inputs received from users of the standard, and the consideration given to benefits and impacts during its development.

Prior to the commencement of a revision (or amendment) to a management system standard, ISO/Guide 72:2001 Guidelines for the justification and development of management system standards recommends that a “Justification Study” is prepared to present a case for the proposed project and that it outlines details of the data and inputs used to support its arguments. In relation to the development of ISO 9001:2008 user needs were identified from the following:

-the results of a formal “Systematic Review” on ISO 9001:2000 that was performed by the members of ISO/TC 176/SC2 during 2003-2004
-feedback from the ISO/TC 176/Working Group on “Interpretations”
-the results of an extensive worldwide “User Feedback Survey on ISO 9001 and
The Justification Study identified the need for an amendment, provided that the impact on users would be limited and that changes would only be introduced when there were clear benefits to users.

The key focuses of the ISO 9001:2008 amendment were to enhance the clarity of ISO 9001:2000 and to enhance its compatibility with ISO 14001:2004.

A tool for assessing the impacts versus benefits for proposed changes was created to assist the drafters of the amendment in deciding which changes should be included, and to assist in the verification of drafts against the identified user needs. The following decision making principles were applied:

1) No changes with high impact would be incorporated into the standard;

2) Changes with medium impact would only be incorporated when they provided a correspondingly medium or high benefit to users of the standard;

3) Even where a change was low impact, it had to be justified by the benefits it delivered to users, before being incorporated.

The changes incorporated in this ISO 9001:2008 edition were classified in terms of impact into the following categories:

-No changes or minimum changes on user documents, including records

-No changes or minimum changes to existing processes of the organization

-No additional training required or minimal training required

-No effects on current certifications

The benefits identified for the ISO 9001:2008 edition fall into the following categories:

-Provides clarity

-Increases compatibility with ISO 14001.

-Maintains consistency with ISO 9000 family of standards.

-Improves translatability.

Audit Of Electronic Documents In ISO 9001 Standards

Audit Of Electronic Documents In ISO 9001 Standards

Electronic documents that establish management system policies and procedures can be in a variety of file formats depending on the software applications that are utilized by the organization to generate the documents. Electronic file formats include, Text, HTML, PDF, etc. Spreadsheets and databases formats are also considered to be electronic “documents” subject to the control elements of the management system to being audited.

Given the relative ease with which users can now create electronic spreadsheets and other electronic documents, auditors (either internal or external) should ensure that policies governing the controls that apply to management system documentation in-general are also employed for electronic documents through appropriate procedures.

Organizations need to employ suitable and effective methods within the electronic environment for ensuring the adequate review, approval, publication and distribution of its management system documentation. These should be consistent with the methods for the development and modification of electronic documents.

In many cases document control measures may also be standard features of software applications used for their creation. Therefore auditors should understand these application-specific controls to the degree that these are utilized as a basis for conformance to the applicable management system standard.

Given the increased capacity to modify, update, reformat and otherwise improve documents within an electronic-based management system, auditors should pay particular attention to control elements such as document identification and document revision level.

As electronic media facilitates an increased rate of document modifications, auditors should verify that the controls being employed for the management of obsolete documents are considered within the organizations’ document control policies and procedures.

Auditors should verify that electronic-based documentation exists to provide orientation to users with regard to the functional and control aspects associated with electronic documents. Additionally, “Point-of-use” requirements associated with the applicable management system standards will typically be addressed in part by the organization’s document access policies. Auditors should understand the organization’s policies and procedures regarding user privileges as these become important factors for properly realizing the organization’s processes.

External electronic communication with suppliers, customers and other interested parties may involve the exchange of documents. Given that these external documents may contain key parameters that specify the functioning of the organization’s processes, auditors should verify the degree to which these documents are formally introduced and controlled within the electronic-based management system.

How To Prepare ISO 9001 Standards Audit Check List

How To Prepare ISO 9001 Standards Audit Check List

There are a few steps to prepare ISO 9001 Standards Check List, namely:

1. Apply the concept of Plan Do Check Act (PDCA). This PDCA concept is applied at the Quality Management System and the process levels.

2. Convert the question to requirement raised by QMR or the QMS Committee which derived from theISO 9001 standards. In this case, several questions can lead to one single requirement.

3. To edit those questions to suit the process that is to be audited. For example, you are going to audit the Purchasing/Procurement Department and you’re sitting down with the Audit Team trying to come up with relevant questions.

The main objective in auditing any process is to extract adequate information and evidence in order to verify that the process is conformant to the ISO 9001 requirements and that, it is effective in achieving its objectives. As an auditor, you need to be able to investigate, assess and verify the conformity and effectiveness of a given process, in terms of its planning, implementation, monitoring & measurement and improvement. As a Lead Auditor, preparing your Audit Team for the actual audit is crucial in ensuring success of the audit excercise. There is no better way to do that than by developing the audit questions with them.

ISO 9001 Standards – Risks and opportunities

The first things to consider when we want to change a people intensive process are:

• What do the people involved fear? These are the risks – things that we must prevent.

• What do people hope for? These are the opportunities – things that we must strive to obtain.

In order to better understand risks and opportunities, we used a two-step approach. We started by interviewing two developers and one manager. The interviews were semi-structured in that we had a set of questions that we needed answers to but in

addition, we used follow-up questions to gain a better understanding of the answers to the predefined questions. The focus of the interview was on what they expected would happen if the company implemented an ISO 9001 certified process. Two typical examples of what came out of the interviews are shown below – one from a developer and one from a manger.

Manager: Implementing ISO 9001 will cost quite a lot. At the same time, the company will get a better overview of its competence, its experience and its document templates. ISO certification is an investment. We are, however, unsure of how long we have to wait before we can reap the benefits.

Developer: Some of the developers may have a negative attitude towards ISO certification because they are afraid it will hurt creativity. This is not only true for ISO 9001 standards but holds also for coding standards and other rules and regulations. Rules

and standards can take away all the fun from the job. In many ways this is the same attitude as we saw when we started to reuse components – many developers were afraid that they would not be allowed to develop things but just had to use “toy bricks”.

After the interviews we found that:

A. Everybody in the company – both mangers and developers – filled in the questionnaire.

The items in the questionnaire that got an average score of 5.0 or more were considered for risk and opportunity analysis. This gave us the following items:

• When we get ISO certified, we will have to generate more documents for each development project.

• It is important that all employees participate actively in the introduction of new processes, standards and procedures. This is consistent with e.g. Trittmann et al’s observation

• Active management participation is important in order to make the introduction of an ISO certified process a success.

• Active management support is important in order to make the introduction of ISO certification a success.

• An ISO certified process will lead to better working practices in the company in general.

Based on our findings, we identified the following risks that needed to be controlled throughout the implementation of the ISO 9001 certified process:

Risk 1: The introduction of new documents or additions to existing documents.

We decided that we should not make new documents except if absolutely needed.

Risk 2: Developer participation. The developers must be included at all steps in

the process. Their experiences and advices are important input to the new processes and procedures.

Risk 3: Management participation and support. Management must show their commitment by allocating money and time to the ISO implementation activities.

Opportunity 1: Better working practices. The changes in the development process must be considered to be improvements by the developers.

Management and developers are in agreement in the sense that everything the developers found important also was ranked high by management. There were, however, some cases where the two groups disagreed strongly – average score difference greater than 2.0. In all cases, management ranked these items higher than the developers.

The points are:

• Introducing an ISO certified process will cost a lot but will be a good investment – developers 3.3 vs. mangers 6.0

• Introducing an ISO certified process will give the company a better control over the order situation – developers 3.0 vs. mangers 6.0

• Introducing an ISO certified process will give us more satisfied customers already after one year – developers 3.2 vs. mangers 6.0

Management is more optimistic than the developers when it comes to business related issues such as order situation and customer satisfaction.

Extreme Programming For ICT In ISO 9001 Standards

Extreme Programming represents a new wave in software development known as the approach. Tom de Marco, the father of structural analysis, calls Extreme Programming the most important movement in software engineering. The strong points of Extreme Programming in the ICT context are as follows:

– Risk minimization. ICT is developing very fast. To catch up with current developments it is necessary to make investments in new technologies and try new tools out. On the other hand, new tools and technologies are immature and one cannot depend on them. The best approach is to make some (preferably small) investment now and after some time invest more or give up, depending on the developments (it is like buying an option on the stock exchange). Extreme Programming is based on incremental software development and its suites the strategy very well.

– Customer orientation. In Extreme Programming all the business decisions are made by the customer and he has the full control over the development process.

– Lack of excessive paperwork. In Extreme Programming programmers concentrate on programming, not on writing documentation. The only artifacts they have to produce are test cases and code.

– Quality assurance through intensive testing. In XP programmers first create test cases then they write code. Automated tests and integration are performed several times a day and they drive the development process.

– Lack of overtime. Short releases and increments allow to gain experience very fast. This makes planning easier and more dependable. As a result programmer do not have to (always) work overtime.

Extreme Programming has also weak points. The most important are problems with software maintenance.

Since the only artifacts are test cases and code, after some time it can be very difficult to maintain the software. It would be also the problem from the ISO 9001 point of view. In the remaining part of the paper we propose how to solve that problem.

Hidden Businees Opportunities

The ISO 9001:2000 Standard has been revised after eight years. And the buzz is rapidly reaching a crescendo. We continue to receive numerous emails and phone calls regarding the impact of the new release. First, let me dispel any anxiety about the November 15, 2008 official “2008” release. There are no new requirements. The changes are largely interpretive, and focus on terminology clarifications. The changes to the ISO 9001 amendment, however, will have considerable benefit.
As a back drop, keep in mind that ISO 9001 is not just an International Standard for a Quality Management System. It is the world’s most recognized business management standard. And it makes a strong business case. It focuses attention on leadership, business planning, organizational business processes, your customers (internal and external), measurement and reporting, and continual improvement. That translates to improved business results and a sustainable competitive advantage.

Overview of the Changes

The points of clarification focus on outsourcing, documentation, management representative, employee competence, design verification and validation, process monitoring, control of nonconforming product and corrective and preventive action. But bear in mind, no “shalls” (requirements) were added or removed.
Examples of select changes include: In an attempt to clarify the term “outsourcing,” notes were added that require the organization to identify processes (and the control of these) to be completed by an external party. With respect to documentation, the changes focus on improving the compatibility betweenISO 9001 and ISO 14001.
The only significant addition to the management representative sub clause was to require that the MR be a member of the organization’s management team. This means a contracted person could serve in this role as long as he or she is also considered part of management. The management representative does not have to be full-time.
With regard to competence of employees, a note was added to make training more pervasive throughout the organization. Training applies to all employees directly or indirectly responsible for delivering a service or producing a product (everyone that is part of the quality chain). A complete listing of changes can be found in Annex B (Table B.1) of the Standard. Also, note that there is better alignment with ISO 14001:2004.

ISO 9001 and occupational health and safety

ISO 9001 and occupational health and safety

Adopting ISO 9001 might lead to improvements in occupational health and safety in a variety of ways. In the process of formally documenting procedures, for example, managers can identify and eliminate hazardous practices and add safety precautions. Moreover, by fostering more focused attention to detail,ISO 9001 adoption can reveal new “win-win” opportunities to improve quality or efficiency and occupational health and safety that were previously obscured by indirect and distributed costs and benefits.

Additionally, processes that provide warning signals and prompt corrective action can forestall serious accidents. Finally, routine auditing and corrective action procedures required by ISO 9001 to address management system failures encourage root-cause analysis that can identify problematic work practices that might otherwise precipitate not only quality failures, but occupational health and safety concerns.

Departments charged with managing quality sometimes also manage health and safety, and companies are increasingly implementing integrated management systems that incorporate all these considerations. Occupational health and safety can be improved by applying the tools of continuous improvement associated with ISO 9001 certification. Employees who know how to identify root causes of quality problems, for example, also have the skills to identify root causes of safety problems.

The high rates of repetition and increased monitoring implicit in the emphasis of ISO 9001 on routinization and standardization of tasks can increase stress and repetitive motion injuries, potentially worsening the safety records of plants with quality program. Moreover, to the extent that the higher equipment utilization associated with ISO 9001 adoption translates into reduced employee downtime, employee fatigue, a major cause of injuries, might be expected to increase. Additionally, new quality management procedures implemented in association with ISO 9001 that add inspection tasks to work processes optimized for production can occasion poor ergonomic conditions that leave employees susceptible to injuries.

Process Approach In ISO 9001 Standards

Process Approach In ISO 9001 Standards

The ISO 9001 International Standard promotes the adoption of a process approach when developing, implementing and improving the effectiveness of a quality management system, to enhance customer satisfaction by meeting customer requirements.

For an organization to function effectively, it has to determine and manage numerous linked activities. An activity or set of activities using resources, and managed in order to enable the transformation of inputs into outputs, can be considered as a process. Often the output from one process directly forms the input to the next.

The application of a system of processes within an organization, together with the identification and interactions of these processes, and their management to produce the desired outcome, can be referred to as the “process approach”.

An advantage of the process approach is the ongoing control that it provides over the linkage between the individual processes within the system of processes, as well as over their combination and interaction.

When used within a quality management system, such an approach emphasizes the importance of

a) understanding and meeting requirements,

b) the need to consider processes in terms of added value,

c) obtaining results of process performance and effectiveness, and

d) continual improvement of processes based on objective measurement

ISO 9001 Standards & ISO 14001 Standards

In order to assist organizations to have a full understanding of the new ISO 9001:2008, it may be useful to have an insight on the revision process, how this revision reflects the inputs received from users of the standard, and the consideration given to benefits and impacts during its development.

Prior to the commencement of a revision (or amendment) to a management system standard, ISO/Guide 72:2001 Guidelines for the justification and development of management system standards recommends that a “Justification Study” is prepared to present a case for the proposed project and that it outlines details of the data and inputs used to support its arguments. In relation to the development of ISO 9001:2008 user needs were identified from the following:

-the results of a formal “Systematic Review” on ISO 9001:2000 that was performed by the members of ISO/TC 176/SC2 during 2003-2004
-feedback from the ISO/TC 176/Working Group on “Interpretations”
-the results of an extensive worldwide “User Feedback Survey on ISO 9001 and
The Justification Study identified the need for an amendment, provided that the impact on users would be limited and that changes would only be introduced when there were clear benefits to users.

The key focuses of the ISO 9001:2008 amendment were to enhance the clarity of ISO 9001:2000 and to enhance its compatibility with ISO 14001:2004.

A tool for assessing the impacts versus benefits for proposed changes was created to assist the drafters of the amendment in deciding which changes should be included, and to assist in the verification of drafts against the identified user needs. The following decision making principles were applied:

1) No changes with high impact would be incorporated into the standard;

2) Changes with medium impact would only be incorporated when they provided a correspondingly medium or high benefit to users of the standard;

3) Even where a change was low impact, it had to be justified by the benefits it delivered to users, before being incorporated.

The changes incorporated in this ISO 9001:2008 edition were classified in terms of impact into the following categories:

-No changes or minimum changes on user documents, including records

-No changes or minimum changes to existing processes of the organization

-No additional training required or minimal training required

-No effects on current certifications

The benefits identified for the ISO 9001:2008 edition fall into the following categories:

-Provides clarity

-Increases compatibility with ISO 14001.

-Maintains consistency with ISO 9000 family of standards.

-Improves translatability.

Audit Of Electronic Documents In ISO 9001 Standards

Audit Of Electronic Documents In ISO 9001 Standards

Electronic documents that establish management system policies and procedures can be in a variety of file formats depending on the software applications that are utilized by the organization to generate the documents. Electronic file formats include, Text, HTML, PDF, etc. Spreadsheets and databases formats are also considered to be electronic “documents” subject to the control elements of the management system to being audited.

Given the relative ease with which users can now create electronic spreadsheets and other electronic documents, auditors (either internal or external) should ensure that policies governing the controls that apply to management system documentation in-general are also employed for electronic documents through appropriate procedures.

Organizations need to employ suitable and effective methods within the electronic environment for ensuring the adequate review, approval, publication and distribution of its management system documentation. These should be consistent with the methods for the development and modification of electronic documents.

In many cases document control measures may also be standard features of software applications used for their creation. Therefore auditors should understand these application-specific controls to the degree that these are utilized as a basis for conformance to the applicable management system standard.

Given the increased capacity to modify, update, reformat and otherwise improve documents within an electronic-based management system, auditors should pay particular attention to control elements such as document identification and document revision level.

As electronic media facilitates an increased rate of document modifications, auditors should verify that the controls being employed for the management of obsolete documents are considered within the organizations’ document control policies and procedures.

Auditors should verify that electronic-based documentation exists to provide orientation to users with regard to the functional and control aspects associated with electronic documents. Additionally, “Point-of-use” requirements associated with the applicable management system standards will typically be addressed in part by the organization’s document access policies. Auditors should understand the organization’s policies and procedures regarding user privileges as these become important factors for properly realizing the organization’s processes.

External electronic communication with suppliers, customers and other interested parties may involve the exchange of documents. Given that these external documents may contain key parameters that specify the functioning of the organization’s processes, auditors should verify the degree to which these documents are formally introduced and controlled within the electronic-based management system.

How To Prepare ISO 9001 Standards Audit Check List

How To Prepare ISO 9001 Standards Audit Check List

There are a few steps to prepare ISO 9001 Standards Check List, namely:

1. Apply the concept of Plan Do Check Act (PDCA). This PDCA concept is applied at the Quality Management System and the process levels.

2. Convert the question to requirement raised by QMR or the QMS Committee which derived from theISO 9001 standards. In this case, several questions can lead to one single requirement.

3. To edit those questions to suit the process that is to be audited. For example, you are going to audit the Purchasing/Procurement Department and you’re sitting down with the Audit Team trying to come up with relevant questions.

The main objective in auditing any process is to extract adequate information and evidence in order to verify that the process is conformant to the ISO 9001 requirements and that, it is effective in achieving its objectives. As an auditor, you need to be able to investigate, assess and verify the conformity and effectiveness of a given process, in terms of its planning, implementation, monitoring & measurement and improvement. As a Lead Auditor, preparing your Audit Team for the actual audit is crucial in ensuring success of the audit excercise. There is no better way to do that than by developing the audit questions with them.

ISO 9001 Standards Training DVD

ISO 9001 Standards Training DVD
The major reasons that company leadership or management decides to seek ISO 9000 certification are to gain continued or increased business and to maintain effective operations.

A company can maintain a relationship with customers, as well as get increased business through complying to the ISO 900 standards or becoming certified. This comes from satisfying customer demands, the desire for European business, and to advertise.

The Introduction to ISO 9001:2008 DVD covers 3 major areas, which will help companies in the process of implementing ISO 9000 Standards. It consists of:

First, to describe some basic information on ISO 9000 Standards. It will specifically refer to ISO 9001:2008 Standards. The video will explained on topic like what is ISO 9000 Standards, The origin, history & evolution, Series of ISO 9000, version & certification in ISO 9000 Standards.

Then, the DVD will go into the introduction on quality management. It will explained on topics like what is quality, quality characteristic, quality management, Quality Management Principles, ISO 9000 vs. Quality, what is Quality Management System & etc.

Finally, the DVD will technically highlight the requirement of Quality Management System in ISO 9001:2008. It also going through in details the steps in implementing Quality Management System in ISO 9001:2008.